Introduction
CarePort is widely used for post acute referrals and transitions of care. It is also closely associated with the WellSky ecosystem (CarePort was acquired by WellSky).
If you are searching “CarePort alternatives,” you are usually not browsing casually. You are trying to fix something specific:
-
Hospitals want faster placement, fewer phone calls, and better visibility into where referrals stand.
-
SNFs and post acute providers want cleaner intake, less back-and-forth, and fewer incomplete referrals.
-
Health systems want tracking, performance data, and fewer readmission surprises.
-
Everyone wants less faxing and fewer “did you get it” follow-ups.
This guide breaks down the strongest alternatives by use case and explains what each is best at, plus when it makes sense to build a workflow hub on Tadabase instead of forcing a one-size-fits-all referral tool.
TL;DR quick picks
Best CarePort style discharge placement and digital referrals: Aidin
Best for SNF workflows plus coordination (SNF heavy orgs): PointClickCare
Best for referral scheduling and loop closure (access and leakage): Blockit
Best for community and social needs closed loop referrals: Unite Us
Best for post acute tracking and analytics: Post Acute Analytics
Best when your team needs custom intake, portals, automation, and reporting across tools: Build on Tadabase
What CarePort is really used for
CarePort is commonly associated with transitions of care and referral intake workflows (and is packaged in the broader WellSky suite).
So the real “alternative” is not just another name on a list. It is a tool that helps you do at least one of these jobs better:
-
Discharge planning and placement throughput
-
Post acute referral intake and facility coordination
-
Scheduling and referral completion tracking
-
Network performance analytics and post acute visibility
-
Closed loop referrals across community partners
That’s how this list is organized.
Best CarePort alternatives by use case
1) 
Aidin: Hospital discharge planning and post acute placement
Aidin positions itself around digital discharge planning and post acute referral workflows for hospitals.
Why teams switch to it
-
Strong fit when the day-to-day pain is discharge placement and referral status tracking.
-
Built around the hospital care manager workflow.
Where it can struggle
-
Adoption varies by market and facility participation. That matters a lot because if receiving facilities are not active, staff revert to fax and phone anyway.
Real world example: hospital social work teams report that CarePort can be more universally recognized, while other systems can cause fallbacks to faxing when facilities are unfamiliar with the tool.
Best for
-
Hospitals that want a dedicated discharge and post acute referral workflow tool.
2) 
PointClickCare: SNF and post acute provider operations plus coordination
PointClickCare is heavily associated with post acute and senior care workflows, and it positions transitions-of-care capabilities as part of its broader platform offering.
Why teams choose it
-
Strong when SNF operations and clinical workflows sit alongside referral and coordination needs.
-
Good fit if you are already anchored in SNF workflow tooling.
Where it can struggle
-
If you only need referral intake and not broader platform depth, it may be heavier than necessary.
Best for
-
SNF heavy orgs that want a platform approach.
3) 
Blockit: Referral scheduling, access, and loop closure
Blockit positions around digital referral management and scheduling, with a focus on getting the referral to convert into an appointment and reducing leakage.
Why teams switch to it
-
If “referrals are falling into a black hole” is your problem, loop closure and scheduling matter more than placement-style workflows.
-
Strong fit for organizations treating referrals as an access and throughput problem.
Where it can struggle
-
Not every org needs deep scheduling logic. If your workflow is more discharge placement than outpatient access, it may not be the right category.
Best for
-
Health systems focused on access, referral completion, and leakage reduction.
4) 
Unite Us: Closed loop referrals across community partners
Unite Us positions as a closed loop referral network connecting healthcare and community based organizations, focused on connecting clients to services and tracking outcomes across partners.
Why teams choose it
-
Strong fit for social needs referrals and community coordination.
-
Designed around cross-org partner workflows, not just facility placement.
Where it can struggle
-
If your primary use case is discharge placement into SNFs and post acute facilities, this may be a different category than what you actually need.
Best for
-
Closed loop networks, social determinants, community partner referrals.
5) 
Post Acute Analytics: Post acute tracking and performance analytics
Post Acute Analytics is positioned around post acute tracking and analytics.
Why teams switch to it
-
Great when the pain is visibility: where patients go, how they perform, what outcomes look like, where delays happen.
-
Useful for network management and performance monitoring.
Where it can struggle
-
If you need a front-line referral workflow tool first, analytics alone will not fix the intake bottleneck.
Best for
-
Organizations optimizing post acute networks and outcomes.
A quick comparison table
| Tool | Best for | Why it wins | Watch outs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aidin | Hospital discharge planning and placement | Built around care manager referral workflows | Facility participation varies, can trigger fax fallbacks |
| PointClickCare | SNF heavy orgs | Broader post acute platform plus coordination | Can be more platform than you need |
| Blockit | Referral loop closure and scheduling | Access, scheduling, completion tracking | Different category than discharge placement |
| Unite Us | Closed loop community referrals | Network-based partner referrals and tracking | Not a direct discharge placement replacement |
| Post Acute Analytics | Tracking and analytics | Post acute visibility and performance monitoring | Needs workflow tool alongside in many orgs |
| Tadabase | Custom workflows across teams and systems | You build exactly what your process needs | Requires ownership of design and setup |
What users complain about in real life (and why it matters)
In practice, referral tools fail for reasons that have nothing to do with features:
-
The UI feels chaotic or clunky, so staff resist using it
-
Receiving facilities are not active on the platform, so you end up faxing anyway
-
A subset of facilities are disconnected from the network, so workflows split
This is why “best CarePort alternative” depends heavily on your geography, partner participation, and whether your workflow is more placement-driven or access-driven.
When building on Tadabase is the best alternative
You choose Tadabase when your real problem is not “we need a new referral tool,” but:
-
“We need one intake process across multiple referral sources”
-
“We need portals for facilities, patients, and internal staff”
-
“We need approvals, escalations, and audit trails”
-
“We need automation and reporting that matches our process, not someone else’s”
-
“We need to connect data from EHR exports, spreadsheets, calls, and referral platforms into one workflow”
In other words, if you are going to keep parts of the ecosystem (Epic workflows, fax edge cases, facility preferences) and you need a system to stitch it together, Tadabase becomes the control layer.
Examples you can build:
-
Referral intake hub with status stages, SLAs, and escalations
-
Facility directory with participation scoring (who actually responds electronically)
-
Intake completeness checks (missing docs, missing auth, missing clinical packet)
-
Role-based portals (hospital CM, SNF intake, home health intake)
-
Automated follow-ups and reminders when a referral sits too long
How to choose the right CarePort alternative
Use these five questions:
-
Is your workflow mostly discharge placement or referral access and scheduling?
-
Do your receiving partners actually use the same platform in your market?
-
Do you need front-line workflow first, or analytics visibility first?
-
Are you SNF heavy and want a broader platform, or do you want a focused tool?
-
Do you need a tool that fits your process, or are you willing to adapt your process to the tool?
Frequently asked questions
Is CarePort the same as WellSky?
CarePort is associated with the WellSky ecosystem. WellSky acquired CarePort.
What is the best alternative to CarePort for hospitals?
If you want a discharge planning and digital referral workflow tool, Aidin is commonly positioned for that job.
If you need referral scheduling and completion tracking, Blockit is a better fit for access and loop closure.
What if some facilities still require fax?
That is common. Teams report that when facilities are not active on the platform, they revert to faxing.
This is exactly where a workflow hub (often custom) helps, because it tracks both digital and manual paths in one place.
Is there a CarePort alternative for closed loop community referrals?
Yes. Unite Us is positioned as a closed loop referral network across healthcare and community partners.
Conclusion
If your core pain is discharge placement throughput, start with tools built around that workflow (Aidin).
If your problem is access and getting referrals scheduled and completed, look at tools like Blockit.
If you need SNF platform depth, PointClickCare is a common category fit.
If you need visibility and network optimization, Post Acute Analytics is worth evaluating.
If your process is messy, multi-tool, and full of edge cases, building a workflow layer on Tadabase can be the most practical “alternative” because it adapts to reality instead of forcing reality to adapt to software.
